Please fill all the required fields!
The required fields are marked red.

If you believe a lawyer’s account is unreasonable, Alberta gives you a formal process to have it examined by an independent Review Officer. It is inexpensive, it is available to clients and former clients, and it applies even where you signed a retainer agreement that says otherwise.
Most people never use it, usually because they do not know it exists or they discover it after the deadline has passed. This guide explains how the process works and what it can and cannot do.
Under the Alberta Rules of Court, the reasonableness of a lawyer’s charges, or of a retainer agreement, can be submitted to a Review Officer. The process is sometimes still called taxation, an older term for the same thing.
Review Officers are lawyers appointed to conduct these reviews, and they sit at judicial centres across the province. Their function is narrow but useful: they assess whether what you were charged was reasonable, and they can reduce an account.
Two important framing points:
The right to a review generally survives a contrary term in a retainer agreement. You cannot be contracted out of it.
Charges for essentially any legal service. It does not matter whether the work was a will, a real estate transaction, a corporate reorganization, an immigration application, a family matter, or a trial. Charges for disbursements can be examined alongside fees, and the retainer agreement itself can be reviewed.
The time limits are the single most important thing to understand, because a missed deadline usually ends the matter.
Two further points. First, what has to happen inside the limitation window is the commencement of review proceedings, meaning the filing of the appointment document, not the completion of the hearing. Second, the deadline is not absolute. The parties can agree to extend it, and the Court can order an extension. Courts have granted extensions covering multiple years of accounts where the circumstances warranted it.
If you think you are out of time, the practical first step is often the simplest one: ask the lawyer to consent to an extension. There is little downside to asking.
The mechanics are straightforward and do not require a lawyer, although the process is easier with one.
There is no charge for the review itself beyond the filing fee, plus any photocopying the court performs.
Assessment is not a mechanical recalculation of hours. A Review Officer weighs factors including:
Note “time reasonably spent.” An account can be reduced because work took longer than it should have, even if every minute was genuinely worked.
Bring documents, not impressions. The strongest reviews are built on:
Vague dissatisfaction rarely produces a reduction. Specific, documented objections do.
Most fee disputes are preventable, and prevention is largely about the engagement stage:
At Libra Law we discuss fees and scope up front, because clarity about cost is part of the service. If you would like to understand what a matter is likely to involve before it starts, book a consultation.
Alberta’s fee review process exists to keep legal billing accountable, and it is deliberately accessible: a $100 filing fee, a remote hearing, and an independent officer who is a lawyer. The main barrier is the clock. If you are unhappy with an account, act on it well inside the one-year window rather than after it closes.
This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For advice specific to your situation, consult a qualified professional.