Please fill all the required fields!
The required fields are marked red.

Probation periods are common in Alberta workplaces.
Many employers use the first few months of employment to decide whether a new hire is the right fit for the role, team, and business. A probation period can be useful, but it is also easy to misunderstand.
Some employers assume probation means they can terminate an employee for any reason, without risk, as long as the employee has been employed for less than 90 days. Others assume a probation clause is automatic, even if it was never properly written into the employment agreement.
Those assumptions can create problems.
Probation does not remove every legal obligation. Employers still need to consider employment standards, human rights, contract wording, workplace policies, documentation, and fairness in the decision-making process.
Libra Law helps Alberta employers review employment contracts, termination practices, workplace policies, and employment law risks before small problems become costly disputes.
A probation period is a trial period at the beginning of employment.
It gives the employer time to assess whether the employee is suitable for the role. It also gives the employee time to decide whether the job, workplace, and expectations are a good fit.
During probation, the employer may review things such as:
Probation periods are usually addressed in an employment agreement, offer letter, or workplace policy.
The key point is that probation should not be treated casually. If an employer wants to rely on a probation period, the terms should be clear from the start.
Probation periods cause confusion because employers often mix together three different ideas:
These are related, but they are not always the same.
An employer may use a three-month probation period in its contract or policies. Alberta employment standards may have separate rules about minimum termination notice. Common law may also matter depending on the contract, the employee’s circumstances, and how the termination was handled.
This is why employers should not rely on informal assumptions.
A properly drafted employment agreement and a consistent process can reduce risk.
For more general guidance, read Libra Law’s article on Top Employment Law Mistakes Alberta Employers Make.
One common mistake is assuming every new employee is automatically on probation.
If the employment agreement does not clearly include a probation period, the employer may have difficulty relying on one later.
A probation term should be communicated before or at the time the employee accepts the job. It should be clear, written, and included in the offer letter, employment agreement, or another enforceable employment document.
Employers should avoid relying only on verbal comments such as:
Verbal expectations can lead to disputes. Written terms are much safer.
Employers should include a clear probation clause in the employment agreement before employment begins.
The clause should explain:
The clause should be reviewed by a lawyer to make sure it works with the rest of the agreement.
A probation clause that simply says “three-month probation applies” may not be enough.
Employers should be specific. A vague clause may create uncertainty about what the employee agreed to and what rights apply during probation.
A better clause should be clear about the purpose of probation and the employer’s expectations.
For example, employers may want the agreement to explain that continued employment depends on the employee demonstrating suitability for the position.
The wording should also be consistent with the termination clause, workplace policies, and employment standards obligations.
If the probation clause conflicts with another part of the agreement, the employer may create unnecessary risk.
Employers should review probation clauses together with the entire employment agreement.
The probation clause should not be copied from an old template without review. Employment law changes, workplace needs change, and old clauses may not reflect current legal standards.
A lawyer can help employers create probation language that is clear, practical, and aligned with the rest of the contract.
Many employers believe the first 90 days of employment are a risk-free period.
That is not true.
Even during early employment, employers must still comply with legal obligations. Employees must be paid properly. Workplace safety rules still apply. Human rights protections still apply. Employment contracts still matter.
A probationary employee is still an employee.
This means employers should not terminate someone for reasons connected to a protected ground, such as disability, pregnancy, family status, race, religion, gender, age, or other protected characteristics.
A short period of employment does not give an employer permission to discriminate or retaliate.
Before ending employment during probation, employers should ask:
If there is any concern about medical issues, disability, accommodation, pregnancy, family status, or workplace complaints, employers should get legal advice before terminating.
Probation is meant to be an assessment period.
If an employer terminates a probationary employee without any real assessment, the employer may have a harder time showing the decision was fair and connected to suitability.
An employer does not need to create a lengthy performance management process for every probationary employee. But the employer should be able to explain why the employee was not suitable for the position.
This may include concerns about performance, attendance, attitude, skill level, communication, reliability, judgment, or ability to meet reasonable expectations.
The decision should not be arbitrary, discriminatory, or made in bad faith.
Employers should assess probationary employees throughout the probation period.
Helpful steps include:
Documentation does not need to be complicated. Simple notes, emails, or performance check-in records can help show that the employer made a genuine assessment.
Some employers wait until the final day of probation to decide whether the employee should continue.
This creates unnecessary pressure.
If the employer has concerns, it should address them before the probation period expires. Waiting too long may create confusion, especially if the employee continues working after the probation period without any clear communication.
Employers should also be careful with internal deadlines. If a contract says probation lasts three months, the employer should track the dates carefully and make decisions before the period ends.
Employers should create a probation review process.
For example, the employer may schedule check-ins at:
These check-ins do not need to be overly formal, but they help ensure the employer is actively reviewing suitability.
Managers should be trained to raise concerns early rather than waiting until the last moment.
Sometimes an employer is unsure whether a new employee is the right fit and wants more time.
Extending probation may be possible in some situations, but employers should be careful.
If the employment agreement does not allow probation to be extended, or if the extension is not communicated properly before the original probation period ends, the employer may create a dispute.
An employee may argue that probation ended and that they are now entitled to the protections that apply after probation.
If the employer wants the ability to extend probation, the employment agreement should say so clearly.
The agreement should explain:
Employers should not extend probation informally or after the fact.
If the employer is considering an extension because of performance concerns, it should document those concerns and communicate them clearly.
Human rights issues can arise during probation.
For example, a new employee may disclose a disability, request accommodation, become pregnant, take medical leave, raise family status concerns, or report harassment.
If the employer terminates shortly after one of these events, the timing may raise concerns, even if the employee was still within the probation period.
Employers must be careful not to terminate employment for a reason connected to a protected ground.
Employers should pause before terminating a probationary employee if there is any possible human rights issue.
Important questions include:
If the answer to any of these questions is yes, legal advice is recommended before making a final decision.
Even if an employee is terminated during probation, the employer must still pay amounts that are owed.
This may include wages, vacation pay, earned commissions, expense reimbursements, or other amounts required by the employment agreement or applicable law.
Employers sometimes focus on whether termination notice is required and forget about final pay obligations.
That can lead to employment standards complaints and unnecessary conflict.
Before ending employment, employers should prepare a final pay review.
This may include:
Payroll and management should coordinate so the employee receives what they are owed.
Probation is not a replacement for good hiring.
Some employers rush the hiring process and assume probation will solve any mismatch later. This can lead to high turnover, poor documentation, and legal risk.
Probation works best when the employer has already done a reasonable hiring process and uses probation to confirm the fit.
A poor hiring process can create problems, especially if the employer makes promises during recruitment that are not reflected in the employment agreement.
Employers should improve hiring practices before relying on probation.
This may include:
Good hiring practices make probation more effective and reduce disputes.
The employment contract is one of the most important documents in the probation process.
If the contract is missing, unclear, outdated, or signed after employment begins, the employer may have difficulty relying on probation or termination language.
Employers should not treat the contract as a formality.
The employment agreement should address:
If the termination clause is poorly drafted, it may create risk beyond the probation period as well.
For related guidance, read Libra Law’s article on Severance Packages in Alberta and Severance Pay in Alberta.
Some employers label a probationary termination as “for cause” when the real issue is poor fit or performance.
This can be risky.
Just cause is a serious legal standard. It generally requires significant misconduct or circumstances where continued employment is no longer appropriate. Poor fit, weak performance, or lack of suitability during probation may not always amount to just cause.
Using “cause” language too casually can escalate a simple termination into a legal dispute.
Employers should be careful with termination wording.
If the employee is being terminated because they are not suitable during probation, the termination documents should be drafted carefully and accurately.
Employers should avoid overstating the reason for termination or making allegations they cannot prove.
If there is serious misconduct, legal advice should be obtained before alleging just cause.
Probation decisions are often made by frontline managers.
If managers are not trained, they may mishandle the process. They may promise job security, ignore performance issues, fail to document concerns, delay difficult conversations, or terminate in a way that creates legal risk.
Managers may also fail to recognize human rights issues or accommodation requests.
Employers should train managers on probation basics.
Managers should understand:
A simple manager checklist can help prevent mistakes.
Inconsistent treatment can create risk.
For example, if one employee receives training, feedback, and a chance to improve, while another employee is terminated immediately for similar issues, the employer may have difficulty explaining the difference.
Inconsistency can also support allegations of unfairness, discrimination, or bad faith.
Employers should use a consistent probation process.
This may include:
Consistency does not mean every employee must be treated identically. It means decisions should be reasonable, documented, and based on legitimate workplace factors.
Employers sometimes assume Alberta employment standards are the only concern.
They are not.
Employment standards set minimum requirements. Depending on the contract and circumstances, common law may also matter. If the employment agreement does not properly limit entitlements, an employee may argue for more than the minimum standards.
This can be relevant even with relatively short-service employees, depending on the situation.
Employers should not rely only on minimum standards when drafting contracts or handling terminations.
A lawyer can review whether the employment agreement contains enforceable termination language and whether the probation clause is properly integrated.
This is especially important for:
Even after a probationary employee leaves, the employer may still have issues to manage.
These may include:
If the employee had access to confidential information, the employer should act quickly to protect the business.
If the employment agreement includes post-employment restrictions, those clauses should be reviewed before the employer tries to enforce them.
For related information, read Libra Law’s article on Non-Compete Clauses in Alberta.
Before hiring a new employee, employers should:
Before terminating during probation, employers should:
Probation periods can help employers assess new employees, but they must be handled carefully.
A properly drafted probation clause, a clear onboarding process, good documentation, and careful termination practices can reduce legal risk.
Libra Law helps Alberta employers with:
Whether you are hiring a new employee, updating your employment contracts, or considering termination during probation, Libra Law can help you understand your options.
Visit our employment law services page or contact Libra Law to discuss probation periods and employer obligations in Alberta.
This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. To obtain advice specific to your situation, please consult a lawyer or qualified professional.
How long is a probation period in Alberta?
Many Alberta employers use a 90-day probation period, but the probation period should be clearly written into the employment agreement. Employers should not assume probation applies automatically.
Can an employer terminate an employee during probation?
Yes, an employer may be able to terminate employment during probation, but the employer should still consider the employment agreement, employment standards, human rights obligations, final pay, and whether the decision was made for a lawful reason.
Do employees have rights during probation?
Yes. Probationary employees still have workplace rights. Employers must still follow legal obligations related to wages, workplace safety, human rights, and other applicable requirements.
Can probation be extended in Alberta?
A probation period may be extended if the employment agreement clearly allows it and the extension is handled properly. Employers should not extend probation informally or after the original probation period has already ended without legal advice.
Should employers get legal advice before terminating during probation?
Yes, especially if there are human rights concerns, medical issues, performance disputes, unclear contract wording, or uncertainty about final pay and termination obligations.